Home / Guides

What I've changed my mind about

This is a changelog, not a guide. When I change my mind about the method, I add an entry: the old position, the new one, and what forced the update. Newest first. I will keep appending.

August 2026. You do not have to wait for a bench to begin

I used to think this program could not start until you had a 45-degree back-extension bench. No bench, no training. I told people to wait.

I think now: people can do the early work without one. The program is still a loaded back-extension progression; that is the method, and the bench is where the load can keep climbing.

Why I flipped. That gap was eating more comebacks than flares were. People who were ready to train waited, and a lot of them never started. The same extensor work can be done at a lower load before the bench arrives. I was wrong to treat the bench as a gate on day one. The no-bench page is the on-ramp. The progression is still the program.

August 2026. What an MRI report is for

I used to think a report that says degenerative disc disease at L5–S1 is the explanation. Treat the finding as the cause, and treat the spine as the story the words describe.

I think now: the finding can be real and still not be the whole story. Disc degeneration is common on scans of people who feel fine. The report is a picture, not a plan. How my back responds to a tolerable dose decides more than the radiology language.

Why I flipped. The asymptomatic imaging literature, especially Brinjikji and colleagues in 2015: degeneration, bulges, and related findings show up in large shares of pain-free adults. And my own report. I have lifted since my teens and sat an office job in my early twenties. The scan showed L5–S1 degenerative disc disease, some change at L4–L5, no major hernia. A flare after my first daughter arrived did not rewrite those discs; it changed how loudly my back complained. The finding stayed a fact. It stopped being the program. The MRI guide is the longer read of the numbers.

July 2026. Waiting for zero pain keeps the back weak

I used to think rest until it is gone, then train. Pain means stop. Zero pain is the green light.

I think now: train at a dose the back can tolerate, and let the next morning decide the next session. Some pain during work is expected. A clearly worse morning is information: ease the dose, do not quit. Waiting for the number to hit zero keeps the extensors weak, then the pain stays.

Why I flipped. Years in the rest-and-flare loop, then the opposite result once I loaded at a dose the next morning could live with. The bed-rest trials point the same way: advice to stay active beats advice to rest. The next-day rule is the practical version of that update.